Smart Contract Audit

Find the Bugs Before
Attackers Do

Ment Tech Labs runs professional smart contract audit services and smart contract security audits. We combine manual code review, automated analysis using Slither, Mythril, and Foundry, economic attack modeling, and formal verification. We cover EVM, Solana, Cosmos, and Substrate protocols across DeFi, NFT, token, and enterprise contracts.
Smart Contract Audits Completed
0 +
Total Value Secured in Audited Protocols
0 B+
Post-Audit Exploits at Implementing Clients
0
Vulnerabilities Found & Reported Across Audits
0 +

Trusted & Certified

Quick Answer

What is Smart Contract Audit Services?

A smart contract audit is a thorough security review of your contract code. We check for every known vulnerability class. This includes reentrancy, integer overflow and underflow, access control failures, flash loan attacks, oracle manipulation, front-running, logic errors, gas issues, and economic attack vectors.
A complete audit has five parts. First, manual expert code review, which is the most valuable part of any audit. Second, automated static analysis using Slither and Mythril. Third, dynamic testing through Foundry fuzzing. Fourth, economic and game-theoretic attack modeling. Fifth, formal verification for the most critical functions.
Every audit ends with a detailed report. Each finding is categorized by severity, Critical, High, Medium, Low, or Informational. We include remediation recommendations and verify all fixes after your team applies them.

Key Benefits

The average smart contract exploit costs between $10 million and $600 million in protocol losses. Finding vulnerabilities before attackers do is not optional when real money is on the line.
Audited protocols attract more users and higher total value locked than unaudited ones. Trust is a competitive advantage in Web3.
Most CEX listings, institutional DeFi integrations, and serious investors require a smart contract audit service report before they engage. An audit is not just security. It is a business requirement.

ISO 27001 · Certified

SOC 2 Type II · Compliant

Deloitte Fast 50 · Awarded

ERC-3643 · Compatible

KYC / AML · Integrated

MiCA-Ready · EU Compliant

VARA · UAE Licensed

OpenAI Partner · Certified

ISO 27001 · Certified

SOC 2 Type II · Compliant

Deloitte Fast 50 · Awarded

ERC-3643 · Compatible

KYC / AML · Integrated

MiCA-Ready · EU Compliant

VARA · UAE Licensed

OpenAI Partner · Certified

Industry Challenges

The Smart Contract Exploit Epidemic

Unaudited smart contracts are the single biggest source of DeFi losses. The numbers are not small.

$3.8B Stolen in 2022 Alone

Over $3.8 billion was stolen from DeFi protocols in 2022 alone. The vast majority of those exploits involved vulnerabilities that a professional audit would have caught before deployment.

Complex Vulnerability Classes

Reentrancy, flash loan attacks, oracle manipulation, and economic exploit vectors require deep specialized knowledge to find. Traditional code review is not enough. You need auditors who think like attackers.

Composability Attack Surfaces

DeFi protocols interact with dozens of other contracts. Attack vectors often come from how your contract behaves when combined with others, not from your code alone. A real audit looks at the full composability surface.

Ruined Protocol Reputations

A single successful attack destroys user trust, wipes TVL, and crashes token value. Even protocols that recover technically never fully recover in reputation. There is no fixing it after the fact. Prevention is the only strategy that works.

$3.8B

DeFi losses to exploits in 2022 (Chainalysis)

65%

Of exploits involve known vulnerability classes

$15-150K

Audit cost vs. $10M-600M average exploit loss

The Cost of Inaction

The expected value of deploying unaudited smart contracts is negative. A 5% probability of a $10M exploit = $500K expected loss. A $50K audit eliminates this exposure.

Our Solution

Comprehensive Smart Contract Security Audit

Ment Tech Labs runs a multi-layer smart contract audit services process. We combine manual review, automated analysis, and economic attack modeling to find what others miss.

Manual Expert Code Review

Our senior blockchain security engineers read every line of your code. This is the only way to catch complex business logic vulnerabilities that automated tools will never find on their own.

Automated Static & Dynamic Analysis

We run Slither, Mythril, and Echidna and Foundry fuzzing across your full codebase. This covers known vulnerability patterns at scale and surfaces issues that manual review alone might miss.

Economic Attack Modeling

We model how a motivated attacker would try to break your protocol economically. This includes price manipulation, flash loan attack vectors, liquidation cascades, and incentive misalignments that look fine in code but break under real market conditions.

Remediation Verification

When your team fixes the issues we find, we re-audit every single one at no extra cost. We do not just hand you a report and walk away. We stay until the vulnerabilities are properly resolved.

Core Capabilities

Audit Coverage

Our smart contract auditing services cover every known smart contract attack class. Nothing gets skipped.

Reentrancy & State Management

We check for single-function reentrancy, cross-function reentrancy, read-only reentrancy, and any violations of the checks-effects-interactions pattern.

Flash Loan Attack Analysis

We model price manipulation via flash loans, liquidity pool attacks, governance flash loan exploits, and MEV and sandwich attack vectors.

Access Control & Privilege Escalation

initializers, and any path that could lead to an ownership takeover.

Oracle Manipulation

We test for TWAP manipulation, spot price oracle exploitation, oracle staleness issues, and single-source oracle dependencies that create exploitable weak points.

Arithmetic & Precision

We check for integer overflow and underflow, precision loss, rounding errors, and vulnerabilities in fee calculation logic.

Economic & Tokenomics Analysis

We analyze token inflation bugs, reward manipulation paths, liquidity pool drain vectors, and any incentive misalignment that could be exploited under real market conditions.

Technical Architecture

Audit Methodology

Multi-layer smart contract security review process.

L1
Network Layer
Slither Static Analysis
Mythril Symbolic Exec
Foundry Fuzzing
Gas Optimization Scan
L2
Manual Review Phase
Business Logic Review
Reentrancy Analysis
Access Control Audit
Economic Modeling
L3
Formal Verification
Certora CVL Specs
Invariant Proofs
Postcondition Checking
State Machine Proofs
04
Reporting Phase
Severity Classification
PoC Exploits
Remediation Guide
Remediation Verification
Slither
Aderyn
Semgrep
Mythril
Foundry Fuzz
Echidna
Manticore
Tenderly Sim
Certora Prover
KEVM
Halmos
Act
Severity Matrix
PoC Exploits
Gas Analysis
Architecture Diagram
Our Process

Smart Contract Audit Process

Systematic 5-phase audit from initial review to remediation verification.

Code Intake Icon

Code Intake & Scope DefinitionDay 1–2

Review the codebase, agree on the exact audit scope, document the deployment environment, and prepare the testing environment.

Deliverables: Scope agreement, Test environment, Threat model, Audit plan

01
Automated Analysis Icon

Automated AnalysisDay 3–5

Our smart contract auditing services include running Slither, Mythril, Foundry fuzzing, and gas optimization tools across the full codebase while triaging automated findings.

Deliverables: Automated scan report, False positive triage, Priority issues list, Test coverage report

02
Manual Review Icon

Manual Code ReviewDay 6–14

Line-by-line expert review covering business logic, state management, access control, economic attacks, and composability.

Deliverables: Manual findings log, Business logic analysis, Economic attack vectors, Composability review

03
Formal Verification Icon

Formal Verification (if in scope)Day 12–18

Write CVL specifications and prove critical protocol invariants using Certora Prover.

Deliverables: CVL specifications, Invariant proofs, Counterexamples, Verification report

04
Report Delivery Icon

Report Delivery & RemediationDay 18–21+

Deliver a detailed audit report with findings, severity ratings, PoC exploits, and remediation guidance followed by re-audit after fixes.

Deliverables: Final audit report, PoC exploits, Remediation guide, Re-audit report

05

Full production network live in 16–24 weeks from engagement start.

Technology Stack

Built with Enterprise-Grade Technology

Blockchain Networks

Ethereum
Solana
Polygon
BNB Chain
Avalanche
Arbitrum
Base
Cosmos
Polkadot
TON
TRON
Cardano

Infrastructure

IPFS
Arweave
The Graph
Chainlink
Alchemy
Infura
QuickNode
Tenderly
Moralis
Biconomy

Smart Contract Standards

Solidity
Rust
Vyper
Move
Go
Cairo
OpenZeppelin
Hardhat / Foundry

Integrations & Partners

Slither Static Analysis
Mythril Symbolic Execution
Echidna Fuzzing (Trail of Bits)
Foundry (forge test) Dynamic Testing
Certora Prover Formal Verification
Manticore Symbolic Analysis
Aderyn Rust-based Analyzer
4naly3er Gas Optimization
Immunefi Bug Bounty
Code4rena Audit Platform
Sherlock Audit Coverage
Tenderly Simulation & Debugging

42+ technologies integrated

Compliance & Regulatory

Audit Compliance & Standards

Audit methodology aligned to all major security standards.

United States

SEC
CFTC
FinCEN
OFAC

European Union

MiCA
DORA
AMLD6

United Kingdom

FCA
MLRs
Financial Services Act

Singapore

MAS
PS Act
SFA
PDPA

UAE

VARA
ADGM
DFSA
CBUAE

Switzerland

FINMA
DLT Act
AMLA

Hong Kong

SFC VATP
HKMA
AMLO

Germany

BaFin
eWpG
GwG
SOC 2 Type II
Security, availability & confidentiality
ISO 27001
Information security management
PCI DSS Level 1
Payment data security
GDPR Compliant
EU data protection
CertiK Audited
Smart contract security
OpenZeppelin Verified
Contract security review
ISO/IEC 27017
Cloud security controls

OWASP Smart Contract Top 10

Comprehensive coverage of OWASP's 10 most critical smart contract risks

SWC Registry

Smart Contract Weakness Classification Registry, all known vulnerability patterns

EIP Security Standards

Ethereum Improvement Proposal security considerations

Immunefi Severity Scale

Industry-standard vulnerability severity classification

MiCA Technical Standards

Audit documentation for EU crypto-asset service providers

VARA Compliance

Dubai VARA security audit standards for DeFi protocols

Security & Audit

Our Audit Team Credentials

Battle-tested blockchain security engineers with DeFi protocol expertise.

CertiK

Smart contract & protocol audits

OpenZeppelin

Security audits & tooling

Trail of Bits

Security research & code review

Hacken

Blockchain security testing

Halborn

Blockchain-native security firm

Quantstamp

Smart contract verification

OSCP

CISSP

Foundry Expert

Certora CVL Certified

All auditors are active DeFi protocol developers, not just security researchers

Proof-of-concept exploits provided for critical and high findings

Economic attack modeling by DeFi protocol architecture specialists

Multi-chain expertise: EVM, Solana, Cosmos, Substrate

Free remediation re-audit for all audit findings

NDA and confidentiality agreements for all engagements

Audit reports suitable for public disclosure and exchange listing

Ongoing security advisory post-audit

Enterprise-Grade Security

Bank-level encryption and compliance standards

256-bit AES encryption

99.99% Uptime SLA

24/7 Monitoring

Industry Applications

Audit Portfolio

We cover every known smart contract attack class. Nothing gets skipped.

DeFi

DeFi AMM Protocol Audit

AMM pool audit covering reentrancy, price manipulation, flash loan vectors, and LP token economic attacks. Found 3 High, 7 Medium findings pre-launch.

3 High findings

$50M+ TVL post-launch

DeFi Lending

Lending Protocol Audit

Compound-style lending protocol audit focusing on liquidation cascades, oracle manipulation, and interest rate model edge cases.

Liquidation bug found

$200M+ secured

NFT

NFT Marketplace Audit

NFT marketplace audit covering royalty bypass, signature replay, price manipulation, and auction front-running vulnerabilities.

Royalty bypass fixed

Signature replay patched

DAO / Governance

Governance Token Audit

ERC-20 + governance contract audit: flash loan governance attacks, vote delegation exploits, and timelock bypass analysis.

Flash loan governance

Vote exploit patched

Infrastructure

Cross-Chain Bridge Audit

LayerZero-based bridge audit covering validator set attacks, signature verification, and cross-chain reentrancy vectors.

Critical signature bug

Bridge secured

RWA Tokenization

RWA Token Standard Audit

ERC-3643 T-REX token audit for institutional RWA platform: compliance logic, forced transfer edge cases, and recovery function analysis.

Compliance logic secured

$100M+ issuance

See Our AI Solutions in Action

Get a personalized live demo tailored to your exact use case from a trusted smart contract auditing services company, built by the same engineers who will work on your project.

Comparison

Smart Contract Audit Options Compared

Why professional auditing outperforms automated scanning alone.

Features
Automated Tools Only
No Audit
Business Logic Review
Economic Attack Modeling
Reentrancy Detection
Manual + Auto
Automated
Composability Risks
Formal Verification
Available
Remediation Verification

Our Recommendation

The most critical vulnerabilities, business logic errors, economic attacks, composability exploits, are only detectable through expert manual review.

Case Study

AMM Protocol: Critical Reentrancy Found Pre-Launch

DeFi AMM Protocol

Decentralized Finance

The Challenge

New AMM protocol preparing for mainnet launch with $20M liquidity seeding. Team had run Slither but had no manual audit. Protocol TVL target: $100M in 90 days.

Our Solution

Full audit: automated analysis, manual review, economic attack modeling, and formal verification of AMM invariants.

1 Critical ↗ Read-only reentrancy enabling drain of all LP funds

Critical Findings

3 High ↗ Price manipulation, oracle stale data, access control

High Findings

$120M ↗ 90 days after audit-cleared launch

TVL Post-Launch

Zero ↗ 18 months in production

Post-Launch Exploits

Ment Tech Labs' token economic design created genuine operator alignment — our hotspot owners became our most effective marketing channel because they had skin in the game.
CEO
Co-Founder & CEO at European IoT Infrastructure Startup

ROI & Value

Smart Contract Audit ROI

The calculus is simple: audit cost vs. exploit loss.

$10M-600M

vs. Source: Chainalysis 2023

$15-150K

vs. Depending on codebase size

100-10,000x

vs. Expected ROI of preventing a single exploit

7-21 days

vs. Before your planned launch date

Exploit Prevention

Average DeFi exploit loss avoidance

$10M-600M

TVL Premium

Audited vs. unaudited protocol TVL

3-5x higher TVL

Exchange Listing

Most CEX require audit before listing

CEX listing enabled

Potential Annual Savings

Up to 70%

Engagement Models

Smart Contract Audit Packages

Audit packages for every codebase size and complexity.

Token Audit

ERC-20/721/1155 token contracts with standard functionality

Ideal for

Token launches, NFT projects, simple staking contracts

Protocol Audit

Full DeFi protocol audit: AMM, lending, yield, governance

Ideal for

DeFi protocols, cross-chain bridges, complex token standards

Enterprise Audit + Formal Verification

Protocol audit with Certora formal verification of critical invariants

Ideal for

High-value protocols ($50M+ TVL), institutional DeFi, RWA platforms

What's Included in Every Engagement

Get Your Tailored Project Quote

Share your requirements and get a detailed technical proposal with clear pricing within 48 business hours.

FAQ

Smart Contract Audit FAQs

Automated tools like Slither and Mythril scan your code for known vulnerability patterns quickly and at scale. They are good at catching common issues but they cannot understand business logic. Manual review is done by a human security engineer who reads every line of code, understands what the protocol is supposed to do, and looks for ways it can be made to do something else. The biggest exploits in DeFi history were not caught by automated tools. They were business logic and economic vulnerabilities that only a skilled human reviewer would find.
A reentrancy attack happens when a malicious contract calls back into your contract before the first execution is finished. If your contract sends funds before updating its internal state, an attacker can keep calling back and draining funds in a loop. The most famous example is the 2016 DAO hack which lost $60 million. We check for single-function, cross-function, and read-only reentrancy in every audit.
A flash loan lets someone borrow a very large amount of tokens with no collateral, as long as they pay it back in the same transaction. Attackers use this to temporarily manipulate token prices, drain liquidity pools, or pass governance votes they could not win otherwise. We model all realistic flash loan attack paths against your protocol as part of every audit.
Formal verification uses mathematical proofs to confirm that your contract behaves exactly as specified under all possible conditions. Instead of testing specific scenarios, it checks every possible state the contract can be in. It is the highest level of assurance available for smart contracts and we apply it to the most critical functions in high-value protocols.
Most audits take between 7 and 21 days depending on the size and complexity of the codebase. A simple token contract can be audited in a week. A full DeFi protocol with multiple interacting contracts takes closer to three weeks. We give you a firm timeline estimate before we start and we stick to it.
Every finding in our audit report is labeled Critical, High, Medium, Low, or Informational. Critical means an attacker can steal funds or permanently break the protocol right now. High means serious risk that needs fixing before launch. Medium means a real vulnerability with limited impact or harder exploitation. Low means minor issues worth fixing but not urgent. Informational means code quality or best practice notes with no direct security impact.
Yes. We audit smart contracts on Solana, Cosmos, Substrate, and other non-EVM chains in addition to all EVM-compatible networks. Each chain has its own vulnerability classes and our auditors have hands-on experience with the specific security risks of each platform.
One audit before launch is the minimum. But protocols change. Every time you upgrade a contract, add a new feature, or integrate a new protocol, you introduce new attack surface. We recommend re-auditing any significant code change. We also offer ongoing security retainer services for protocols that ship updates regularly.

Still have questions?

Can’t find the answer you’re looking for? Our team is here to help.

Related Services

Explore Our Service Ecosystem

Smart Contract

Smart Contract Development

Audited EVM and non-EVM smart contracts with formal verification.

Web3

Web3 Development

Full-stack Web3 dApps with wallet integration and on-chain data.

DApp

DApp Development

Decentralized applications across DeFi, NFTs, and DAOs.

DeFi

DeFi Protocol Development

Composable DeFi protocols: DEX, lending, staking, and yield.

NFT

NFT Marketplace Development

White-label and custom NFT marketplaces with royalty enforcement.

Wallet

Crypto Wallet Development

Self-custody wallets with MPC key management and DeFi integration.

Don't Launch Until Your Contracts Are Audited

A professional security audit is the last step before you deploy contracts that hold real value. Do not skip it.

4.9 / 5.0 from 100+ client reviews

Get in Touch

Call Us

+91-74798-66444

Email Us

Contact@ment.tech

WhatsApp

+91-74798-66444

4.9 / 5.0 from 100+ client reviews